Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68890
Title: Static change impact analysis techniques : a comparative study
Authors: Sun, X
Li, B
Leung, HKN 
Li, B
Zhu, J
Keywords: Change impact analysis
Comparative study
Empirical study
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Journal of systems and software, 2015, v. 109, p. 137-149 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of systems and software 
Abstract: Software Change Impact Analysis (CIA) is an essential technique to identify the potential effects caused by software changes during software maintenance and evolution. A rich body of CIA techniques, especially static CIA techniques, have continuously emerged in recent years such as structural static analysis, textual analysis, and historical analysis. However, there were only a few works focusing on comparison of static CIA techniques. This article attempts to bridge this gap by presenting a comparative study of three class-level static CIA techniques, i.e., Columbus, ROSE, and IRC2M. We compare them based on a CIA comparative framework and conduct an empirical study to evaluate these three CIA techniques and their combinations based on five real-world programs. The empirical results show that: (1) IRC2M and ROSE achieve relatively better precision, recall and F-measure compared to Columbus; (2) combination of any two CIA techniques can improve the precision and recall over their individual one; moreover, combining ROSE with IRC2M produces the best impact results; and (3) combining all three CIA techniques obtain a similar precision and recall as combining ROSE with IRC2M.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68890
ISSN: 0164-1212
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.047
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Dec 11, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Dec 13, 2017

Page view(s)

5
Checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.