Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68887
Title: Risk versus anomaly : a new methodology applied to accruals
Authors: Ohlson, JA 
Bilinski, P
Keywords: The accrual anomaly
Risk and anomaly explanations
New research method
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Source: Accounting review, 2015, v. 90, no. 5, p. 2057-2077 How to cite?
Journal: Accounting review 
Abstract: Research suggesting the existence of the accrual anomaly runs into the issue that risk serves as a competing explanation for abnormal returns. This paper proposes a novel approach to distinguish between risk and anomaly explanations for the negative association between accruals and returns. The intuition is that high-risk stocks should experience relatively high and low returns more often than low-risk stocks. Thus, a variable that has the opposite correlations with high returns than with low returns is unlikely to capture risk, which points toward an anomaly. The paper implements this perspective via two logistic regressions predicting relatively high and low returns. Controlling for standard risk measures, we document that low accruals increase the probability of large positive returns, but reduce the likelihood of large negative returns. This finding is inconsistent with the prediction that accruals reflect risk and supports the hypothesis that the accrual “anomaly” is indeed an anomaly.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68887
ISSN: 0001-4826
EISSN: 1558-7967
DOI: 10.2308/accr-50984
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 15, 2018

Page view(s)

19
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 15, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.