Back to results list
Show full item record
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The different approaches to recent developments in Chinese and US ship arrest laws||Authors:||Ng, J
|Issue Date:||2005||Source:||Electronic journal of comparative law, 2005, v. 9, no. 3, p.1-45 How to cite?||Journal:||Electronic journal of comparative law||Abstract:||In the context of ship arrest law in the West and the East, namely the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), understanding the different approaches adopted in these countries’ maritime courts would be a topic of interest to both comparative lawyers and international traders.
The tremendous volume of shipping activities taking place in the US and China makes the two countries popular forums for ship arrest proceedings. In the US, maritime imports accounted for 42 percent of all imports in 2004. In China, the container volume exported is expected to reach 100 million TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) by 2010. This article argues that a through comparative longitudinal study of these countries’ court practices concerning ship arrest, it may be possible to uncover any consistent approaches taken by the maritime courts. The aim of this article is twofold: (I) to provide an overview of the developments in ship arrest law in today’s US and China, and (ii) to contribute to the comparative study of the different approaches adopted in Chinese and US ship arrest laws by filling a gap in the existing literature in this area.
The last section of the article is devoted to a review of the 2003 New Practice Direction, issued by the Supreme People’s Court, on Chinese maritime procedural law. As there are ten maritime courts in China, different interpretations of the ambiguous maritime statutes are inevitable. The discussion will focus on those approaches to ship arrest laws that were reviewed in the 2003 New Practice Direction.
This article is designed to provide helpful information to European legal professionals who are new to ship arrest law practices in the Chinese maritime courts as well as to more experienced practitioners who may need to enforce a ship arrest order in the PRC’s jurisdiction.
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Article|
Show full item record
Citations as of Apr 22, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.