Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/67410
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLai, JHKen_US
dc.creatorMan, CSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-18T08:47:01Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-18T08:47:01Z-
dc.identifier.issn1648-715Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/67410-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis co-Published with Vilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Pressen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC-BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectAssessment schemeen_US
dc.subjectFacility managementen_US
dc.subjectPerformance indicatoren_US
dc.subjectLiterature reviewen_US
dc.subjectPost-occupancy evaluationen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a performance evaluation scheme for engineering facilities in commercial buildings : state-of-the-art reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage41en_US
dc.identifier.epage57en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/1648715X.2016.1247304en_US
dcterms.abstractVarious post-occupancy evaluation schemes have been introduced for assessing building performance but one tailored for large-scale commercial buildings remains to be seen. Intended to develop a scheme for evaluating the performance of engineering facilities in existing commercial buildings, a multi-stage study was carried out in a dense-built metropolis -Hong Kong. Reported here is the part of work based on an extensive literature review. Considering the characteristics of relevant evaluation schemes, the requirements for useful performance evaluation and the criteria for selecting key performance indicators (KPIs), an integrated process-hierarchy model was formed for identifying applicable indicators for the intended scheme. A total of 71 indicators, classified into five categories: (i) physical, (ii) financial, (iii) task and equipment related, (iv) environmental, and (v) health, safety and legal, were identified. Their representations and their empirical applications, which are helpful for the strategic management of existing buildings, are also described.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of strategic property management, 25 Feb. 2017, v. 21, no. 1, p. 41-57en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of strategic property managementen_US
dcterms.issued2017-02-25-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000396712200004-
dc.identifier.ros2016003402-
dc.source.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1648-9179en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2016003333-
dc.description.ros2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate201804_a bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0751-n10, a0861-n28-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1902-Article Text-4094-1-10-20180517 (1).pdf3.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

151
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

49
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Mar 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.