Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6698
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Management and Marketing | - |
dc.creator | Hsieh, JJPA | - |
dc.creator | Cho, WSV | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:23:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:23:16Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-1315 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6698 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon Press | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights | NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers & Education. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 3 (Nov 2011), DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002 | en_US |
dc.subject | E-Learning tool | en_US |
dc.subject | IS success model | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi-group comparison | en_US |
dc.subject | Media richness | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing e-Learning tools’ success : the case of instructor–student interactive vs. self-paced tools | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in the publication: Po-An J. Hsieh | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in the publication: Vincent Cho | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 2038 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 57 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002 | - |
dcterms.abstract | e-Learning tools have profoundly transformed modern pedagogical approaches. Vendors provide different types of systems, such as self-paced (SP) and instructor–student interactive (ISI) e-Learning tools. Although both types of tools represent promising solutions to facilitate the learning process, it is important to theoretically identify a framework to evaluate the success of these tools and assess whether one type of tool is more effective than another. Toward this end, we (1) propose a model to evaluate e-Learning tools’ success by extending and contextualizing Seddon’s information systems (IS) success model for the e-Learning environment and (2) formulate four hypotheses to predict the differences in the success factors between SP and ISI tools.We test the model and hypotheses using data from 783 students across seven higher education institutions in Hong Kong. The results support the proposed e-Learning tool success model and three of the four hypotheses. ISI tools outperform SP tools in terms of system quality, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and learning outcome. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Computers and education, Nov. 2011, v. 57, no. 3, p. 2025-2038 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Computers and education | - |
dcterms.issued | 2011-11 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000294099000016 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-79958765817 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-782X | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r58966 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hiseh_Cho (Computer and Education) 2011.pdf | Pre-published version | 815.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
164
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
455
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
67
Last Week
1
1
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
57
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.