Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/66711
Title: Covariate adjustments in randomized controlled trials increased study power and reduced biasedness of effect size estimation
Authors: Lee, PH 
Keywords: Adjustment
Cohen's d effect size
Covariates
Data analysis
Epidemiology
Trials
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Journal of clinical epidemiology, Aug. 2016, v. 76, p. 137-146 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of clinical epidemiology 
Abstract: Objectives: This study aims to show that under several assumptions, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), unadjusted, crude analysis will underestimate the Cohen's d effect size of the treatment, and an unbiased estimate of effect size can be obtained only by adjusting for all predictors of the outcome. Study Design and Setting: Four simulations were performed to examine the effects of adjustment on the estimated effect size of the treatment and power of the analysis. In addition, we analyzed data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) study (older adults aged 65-94), an RCT with three treatment arms and one control arm. Results: We showed that (1) the number of unadjusted covariates was associated with the effect size of the treatment; (2) the biasedness of effect size estimation was minimized if all covariates were adjusted for; (3) the power of the statistical analysis slightly decreased with the number of adjusted noise variables; and (4) exhaustively searching the covariates and noise variables adjusted for can lead to exaggeration of the true effect size. Analysis of the ACTIVE study data showed that the effect sizes adjusting for covariates of all three treatments were 7.39-24.70% larger than their unadjusted counterparts, whereas the effect size would be elevated by at most 57.92% by exhaustively searching the variables adjusted for. Conclusion: All covariates of the outcome in RCTs should be adjusted for, and if the effect of a particular variable on the outcome is unknown, adjustment will do more good than harm.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/66711
ISSN: 0895-4356
EISSN: 1878-5921
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.004
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Nov 19, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.