Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65716
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering-
dc.creatorFu, W-
dc.creatorFang, Y-
dc.creatorLiu, DMS-
dc.creatorWang, L-
dc.creatorRen, S-
dc.creatorLiu, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-22T02:09:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-22T02:09:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn2095-2546en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/65716-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectPeak plantar pressureen_US
dc.subjectPressure distributionen_US
dc.subjectRunningen_US
dc.subjectSurfaceen_US
dc.subjectTibia accelerationen_US
dc.titleSurface effects on in-shoe plantar pressure and tibial impact during runningen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage384en_US
dc.identifier.epage390en_US
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jshs.2015.09.001en_US
dcterms.abstractPurpose: This study aims to explore the effects of running on different surfaces on the characteristics of in-shoe plantar pressure and tibial acceleration. Methods: Thirteen male recreational runners were required to run at 12 km/h velocity on concrete, synthetic track, natural grass, a normal treadmill, and a treadmill equipped with an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) cushioning underlay (treadmill_EVA), respectively. An in-shoe plantar pressure system and an accelerometer attached to the tibial tuberosity were used to record and analyze the characteristics of plantar pressure and tibial impact during running. Results: The results showed that there were no significant differences in the 1st and 2nd peak plantar pressures (time of occurrence), pressure-time integral, and peak pressure distribution for the concrete, synthetic, grass, and normal treadmill surfaces. No significant differences in peak positive acceleration were observed among the five tested surface conditions. Compared to the concrete surface, however, running on treadmill_EVA showed a significant decrease in the 1st peak plantar pressure and the pressure-time integral for the impact phase (p < 0.05). These can be further ascribed to a reduced peak pressure observed at heel region (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There may not be an inevitable relationship between the surface and the lower-limb impact in runners. It is, however, still noteworthy that the effects of different treadmill surfaces should be considered in the interpretation of plantar pressure performance and translation of such results to overground running.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of sport and health science, 2015, v. 4, no. 4, p. 384-390-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of sport and health science-
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85006201161-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fu_Surface_effects_in-shoe.pdf732.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

128
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

118
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

48
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

38
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.