Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65547
Title: A rapid and sensitive UHPLC–MS/MS method for quantification of 83b1 in plasma and its application to bioavailability study in rats
Authors: Wen, D
Guo, J
Jiang, F
Huang, C
Zhao, Z
Lu, G
Chen, J
Qin, L
Li, Z
Wang, X
Deng, Z
Huang, M
Chi, CAS
Tang, JOC 
Zhong, G
Keywords: 83b1
Bioavailability
Method validation
UHPLC–MS/MS
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2017, v. 134, p. 71-76 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 
Abstract: Great attentions have been drawn by quinoline for its broad bioactivity as anti-fungal, anti-bacterial and anti-tumor activities. Compared with cisplatin, 83b1, a quinoline derivative, showed equal activity in anti-tumor and lower cyctotoxicity in normal cell. In this study, a simple, rapid and sensitive method for determination of 83b1 in rat plasma using UHPLC–MS/MS was developed for the first time. Loratadine was used as an internal standard (IS). Separation was performed on an Xterra MS C18 column by isocratic elution using acetonitrile: water solution with 1‰ formic acid (90:10, v/v) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in the positive ion-switching electron spray ionization mode with selection reaction monitoring (SRM) was employed to determine 83b1 and IS transitions of m/z 321.82 → 147.84, 382.71 → 258.76 for 83b1 and Loratadine, respectively. The values of specificity, linearity and lower limit of quantification, intra- and inter- day precision and accuracy, extraction recovery, matrix effect and stability for this method satisfied the acceptable limits. The lower limit of quantification was 0.5 ng/mL with a linear range of 0.5–1500 ng/mL. The validated method was employed to study the bioavailability of 83b1 in rat by dosing with intravenous injection (1 mg/kg) and gavage (10 mg/kg), and the oral bioavailability of 83b1 in rat was calculated as 20.9 ± 8.8%.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65547
EISSN: 0731-7085
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.11.011
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
Checked on Nov 13, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.