Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/65286
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorZhang, IXen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T00:43:08Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-19T00:43:08Z-
dc.identifier.issn0148-558Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/65286-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2015en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Zhang, I. X., & Zhang, Y., Accounting discretion and purchase price allocation after acquisitions, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance (Volume 32 and Issue Number 2) pp. 241-270. Copyright © 2015 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/0148558X15598693.en_US
dc.subjectFair-value accountingen_US
dc.subjectGoodwillen_US
dc.subjectIntangible assetsen_US
dc.subjectSFAS 142en_US
dc.titleAccounting discretion and purchase price allocation after acquisitionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage241en_US
dc.identifier.epage270en_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0148558X15598693en_US
dcterms.abstractThe recent movement in standards setting toward fair-value-based accounting beyond financial assets and liabilities calls for more empirical evidence on fair-value measurement, especially that of intangible assets. This article studies the initial valuation of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets after acquisitions. We find that the allocation of purchase price to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets is related to the economic determinants of the valuation. However, it is also significantly affected by managerial incentives arising from the differential treatments of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142. The same managerial discretions are not exhibited in the purchase price allocation prior to SFAS 142, when goodwill and other intangibles are both amortized. These findings suggest that unverifiable fair value measures are associated with the underlying economics but also deviate from the true values in the presence of management reporting incentives. Further analysis suggests that external appraisers constrain managerial discretion in intangible asset valuation to an extent but do not completely eliminate it.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of accounting, auditing and finance, 1 Apr. 2017, v. 32, no. 2, p. 241-270en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of accounting, auditing and financeen_US
dcterms.issued2017-04-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018188885-
dc.source.typearen
dc.description.validate202206 bcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAF-0167-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6740598-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhang_Accounting_Discretion_Purchase.pdfPre-Published version665.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

133
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

114
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.