Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/64780
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorYan, H-
dc.creatorChen, H-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T07:02:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-24T07:02:41Z-
dc.identifier.issn1004-2938-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/64780-
dc.language.isozhen_US
dc.publisher中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社en_US
dc.subjectFake cooperativeen_US
dc.subjectRural differentiationen_US
dc.subjectLiang Shumingen_US
dc.titleThe cooperative campaign in rural areas and the third path : debate and reflectionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage180-
dc.identifier.epage200-
dc.identifier.volume2-
dcterms.abstractA cooperative campaign is now in full momentum in China. There are a lot of controversies going on behind it. Some suggest that we should instead promote specialized cooperatives among the farmers. Some dismiss the majority of the mushrooming cooperatives as"fake."Some propose to take the comprehensive farming associations in Japan,South Korea and Taiwan as our models. These controversies are not just relevant to the agricultural cooperative,they bear upon the debate over China’s path of development. In 1930 s,an agricultural cooperative campaign was also prevalent in China,which was accompanied by furious debates among the intellectuals over China’s future. This paper brings the views and arguments of the intellectuals in these two periods concerning the development of rural cooperative into comparison. We find that the two cooperative campaigns bear similarity with each other in terms of social cognition,judgement of social nature,and the appeal for social reform. We also find that both campaigns are faced with structural predicament. As Chinese rural areas are undergoing rapid transformation,a review of the debate in 1930 s will give us inspiration in addressing current issues.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.alternative农村合作社运动和第三条道路:争论与反思-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation开放时代 (Open times), 2015, v. 2, p. 180-200-
dcterms.isPartOf开放时代 (Open times)-
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2014001664-
dc.description.ros2014-2015 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014001664.pdf2.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

95
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

459
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.