Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/62966
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Finance-
dc.creatorWilliams, M-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-13T04:21:37Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-13T04:21:37Z-
dc.identifier.issn0378-0600-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/62966-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwell Asiaen_US
dc.titleEstate agents : my agent or yours? aspects of breach of fiduciary duty in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage90-
dc.identifier.epage104-
dc.identifier.volume31-
dcterms.abstractAn agent is a fiduciary and as such owes a duty of loyalty to his principal. This clear rule of equity is of long and distinguished pedigree. The law of England and Hong Kong are identical on this issue. Acting for two principals in respect of the same transaction is a clear breach of the duty of loyalty, but may be overlooked if the agent provides full information by way of disclosure to both principals and seeks their informed consent. Estate agents in Hong Kong habitually act for both parties in the sale and purchase of land and seek double commissions. The rule against such double employment and the requirements needed to avoid it are discussed with particular reference to several recent cases, and avenues to allow the estate agency profession to avoid the invalidity of their agency contracts are explored.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHong Kong law journal, 2001, v. 31, p. 90-104-
dcterms.isPartOfHong Kong law journal-
dcterms.issued2001-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr00093-
dc.description.ros2000-2001 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

125
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.