Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness made clearer
Authors: Cheng, W 
Warren, M 
Keywords: Inexplicitness
English conversations
Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English
Issue Date: 2003
Publisher: IPrA Research Center
Source: Pragmatics, 2003, v. 13, no. 3/4, p. 381-400 How to cite?
Journal: Pragmatics 
Abstract: The ability to do indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness is a key component in the repertoire of all competent discoursers and these are commonplace phenomena in written and spoken discourses, particularly in conversations. The study reported in the paper seeks to delineate and exemplify these three terms which are used frequently in the literature, but which are potentially confusing as they are not always unambiguously defined and consistently applied. The purpose of the study is to describe the differences between the three terms in terms of their pragmatic usage and functions, drawing upon a corpus of naturally-occurring conversational data between Hong Kong Chinese and native speakers of English. In so doing, this study underlines the widespread occurrence of these forms of language use and the ways in which participants in spoken discourse employ them to jointly construct both context and meaning.
ISSN: 1018-2101
DOI: 10.1075/prag.13.3.02che
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 16, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.