Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Towards system-wide implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in routine practice : developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF generic and rehabilitation set
Authors: Prodinger, B
Reinhardt, J
Selb, M
Stucki, G
Yan, T
Zhang, X
Li, J
Keywords: Health information systems
practicing standards
International Classification of Functioning
Disability and Health
Quality management
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
Source: Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2016, v. 48, no. 6, p. 508-514 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of rehabilitation medicine 
Abstract: Objective: A national, multi-phase, consensus process to develop simple, intuitive descriptions of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories contained in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Sets, with the aim of enhancing the utility of the ICF in routine clinical practice, is presented in this study.
Methods: A multi-stage, national, consensus process was conducted. The consensus process involved 3 expert groups and consisted of a preparatory phase, a consensus conference with consecutive working groups and 3 voting rounds (votes A, B and C), followed by an implementation phase. In the consensus conference, participants first voted on whether they agreed that an initially developed proposal for simple, intuitive descriptions of an ICF category was in fact simple and intuitive.
Results: The consensus conference was held in August 2014 in mainland China. Twenty-one people with a background in physical medicine and rehabilitation participated in the consensus process. Four ICF categories achieved consensus in vote A, 16 in vote B, and 8 in vote C.
Discussion: This process can be seen as part of a larger effort towards the system-wide implementation of the ICF in routine clinical and rehabilitation practice to allow for the regular and comprehensive evaluation of health outcomes most relevant for the monitoring of quality of care.
ISSN: 1650-1977
EISSN: 1651-2081
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2066
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Sep 19, 2017


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Sep 21, 2017

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Checked on Sep 17, 2017

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.