Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/61593
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorNichol, JE-
dc.creatorBilal, M-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-19T08:56:29Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-19T08:56:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/61593-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Nichol, J.E.; Bilal, M. Validation of MODIS 3 km Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals Over Asia. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 328, 1-9 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8040328en_US
dc.subjectAeroneten_US
dc.subjectAODen_US
dc.subjectAsiaen_US
dc.subjectMODIS 3 kmen_US
dc.titleValidation of MODIS 3 km resolution aerosol optical depth retrievals over Asiaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage9en_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs8040328en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study evaluates the new Aqua MODIS Dark Target (DT) Collection 6 (C6) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) (MYD04_3K) retrieval algorithm at 3 km resolution over Asian countries that have recently experienced severe and increasing air pollution. Retrievals showed generally low accuracy compared with the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET), with only 55% of retrievals within the expected error (EE). The uncertainty appears mainly due to systematic overestimation at both low and high AOD levels. This is attributed to under-prediction of surface reflectance, similar to, but more severe than, the C6 DT product at 10-km resolution. This is because MYD04_3K observes more noise in the surface reflectance computations, due to retention of some bright pixels in the retrieval window which would be discarded at 10 km. Greatest uncertainty was observed at urban sites, especially those dominated by coarse aerosols. Results suggest that the DT at 3 km is less reliable than MODIS C6 AOD products at 10 km.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRemote sensing, Apr. 2016, v. 8, no. 4, 328-
dcterms.isPartOfRemote sensing-
dcterms.issued2016-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000375156500061-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84971607513-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292en_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nichol_MODIS_3Km_Aerosol.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

142
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

66
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

109
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 12, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

98
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.