Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/61033
Title: Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice
Authors: Wolffsohn, JS
Calossi, A
Cho, P 
Gifford, K
Jones, L
Li, M
Lipener, C
Logan, NS
Malet, F
Matos, S
Meijome, JMG
Nichols, JJ
Orr, JB
Santodomingo-Rubido, J
Schaefer, T
Thite, N
van der Worp E
Zvirgzdina, M
Keywords: Attitudes
Global
Myopia control
Myopia management
Myopia progression
Orthokeratology
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Contact lens and anterior eye, 2016, v. 39, no. 2, p. 106-116 How to cite?
Journal: Contact lens and anterior eye 
Abstract: Purpose: Myopia is a global public health issue; however, no information exists as to how potential myopia retardation strategies are being adopted globally.
Methods: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in six languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.
Results: Of the 971 respondents, concern was higher (median 9/10) in Asia than in any other continent (7/10, p < 0.001) and they considered themselves more active in implementing myopia control strategies (8/10) than Australasia and Europe (7/10), with North (4/10) and South America (5/10) being least proactive (p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by increased time outdoors and pharmaceutical approaches, with under-correction and single vision spectacles felt to be the least effective (p < 0.05). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall most practitioners 67.5 (±37.8)% prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients. The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (35.6%), inadequate information (33.3%) and the unpredictability of outcomes (28.2%).
Conclusions: Regardless of practitioners' awareness of the efficacy of myopia control techniques, the vast majority still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. In view of the increasing prevalence of myopia and existing evidence for interventions to slow myopia progression, clear guidelines for myopia management need to be established.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/61033
ISSN: 1367-0484
EISSN: 1476-5411
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.02.005
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jul 17, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jul 15, 2017

Page view(s)

24
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on Jul 9, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.