Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: DCF techniques and nonfinancial measures in capital budgeting : a contingency approach analysis
Authors: Chen, S
Keywords: Capital budgeting
DCF techniques
Nonfinancial measures
Contingency theory
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Source: Behavioral research in accounting, 2008, v. 20, no. 1, p. 13-29 How to cite?
Journal: Behavioral research in accounting 
Abstract: This study empirically examines capital budgeting methods. Based on 115 responses from a cross-sectional survey and two approaches to contingency fit, this study produces three basic findings. First, both discounted cash flow (DCF) techniques and nonfinancial measures are widely used in capital budgeting. However, DCF techniques are more important than nonfinancial measures, and nonfinancial measures appear to serve as a partial substitute when DCF analysis is less efficient. Second, DCF techniques and nonfinancial measures are not unconditionally appropriate. Although the impact of firm strategy on capital budgeting methods is not supported by the present results, the study shows that product standardization affects both capital budgeting methods, as hypothesized. Firms with high product standardization tend to place more emphasis on DCF analysis, while firms with low standardization are more likely to focus on nonfinancial measures. Third, an appropriate fit under contingency theory between product standardization and the two capital budgeting methods is significantly associated with a firm's satisfaction with the capital budgeting process.
ISSN: 1050-4753 (print)
1558-8009 (online)
DOI: 10.2308/bria.2008.20.1.13
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of May 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.