Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/55964
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorHuang, CR-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-29T02:19:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-29T02:19:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn2197-6678 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/55964-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© 2015 Huang; licensee Springer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Huang, C. R. (2015). Notes on Chinese grammar and ontology : the endurant/perdurant dichotomy and Mandarin D-M compounds. Lingua Sinica, 1, 1, 1-22 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40655-015-0004-6en_US
dc.titleNotes on Chinese grammar and ontology : the endurant/perdurant dichotomy and Mandarin D-M compoundsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage22-
dc.identifier.volume1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40655-015-0004-6-
dcterms.abstractY. R. Chao’s (1955) ‘Notes on Chinese Grammar and Logic’ illustrated how logical relations are encoded in Chinese Grammar and his Chinese grammar (Chao 1968) introduced the grammatical category of Measure (M) in Determiner-Measure (D-M) Compounds. Subsequent studies of Chinese typically adopt the general linguistic term of classifier (Aikenvald 2003) and either refer to Chao’s M as a classifier (e.g. Li and Thompson 1981) or assume that it can be further subdivided into two categories: classifiers and measure words (Tai 1994). Many later studies tried to account for the classifiers/measure words contrast via semantic or syntactic tests without reaching a definite conclusion. This paper adopts and merges two lines of Chao’s research to show that the ontological concept of endurant vs. perdurant is elegantly instantiated in Chinese grammar, and by the category of M in particular. By doing so I hope to follow Y. R. Chao’s (1955) giant leap in studying logical relations in Chinese and to take the further step of exploring the significance of the Chinese language for ontological studies, including issues such as whether Quality should be ontologically dependent on entities or instead subsumed by them.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLingua sinica, 2015, v. 1, 1, p. 1-22-
dcterms.isPartOfLingua sinica-
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.artn1-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2014003620-
dc.description.ros2014-2015 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Huang_Chinese_Grammar_Ontology.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

145
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

95
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.