Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: GAAP difference or accounting fraud? Evidence from Chinese reverse mergers delisted from U.S. markets
Authors: Chen, Y
Hu, G 
Lin, L
Xiao, M
Keywords: Accounting fraud
GAAP difference
Chinese reverse mergers
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Louisiana State University
Source: Journal of forensic & investigative accounting, 2015, v. 7, no. 1, p. 122-145 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of forensic & investigative accounting 
Abstract: In 2012, one in four federal securities class-action lawsuits filed in the U.S. involved Chinese Reverse Merge companies (CRMs). However, these lawsuits sometimes have encountered difficulties in court due to insufficient direct evidence of accounting fraud. We propose a new method for fraud detection: use Chinese companies dual-listed in the U.S. and China to establish a benchmark for the normal GAAP difference between the two countries. Using this methodology, we find that only a small fraction of the discrepancies between delisted CRMs’ financial statements filed in the U.S. and those filed in China can be attributed to GAAP difference. This suggests that the remaining discrepancies, which are large and unexplained, are indeed due to accounting fraud. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that delisted Chinese Reverse Merger companies enticed U.S. investors with favorable and fraudulent accounting and financial data.
ISSN: 2165-3755
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Nov 12, 2018

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.