Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/55705
Title: The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors: Wong, MS 
Cheng, JCY
Ng, BKW
Lam, TP
Sin, SW
Lee-Shum, LF
Chow, DHK
Tam, YP
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Patients' acceptance
Rigid spinal orthosis
SpineCor
Treatment efficacy
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Source: Spine, 2008, v. 33 , no. 12, p. 1360-1365 How to cite?
Journal: Spine 
Abstract: Study Design. A prospective study on the comparison of the clinical efficacy and patient's acceptance of the 2 orthotic management methods. Objective. To compare the treatment effectiveness and Patients' acceptance of the flexible spinal orthosis, Spine-Cor with that of the rigid spinal orthosis for the patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The patients' acceptance to the rigid spinal orthoses is always a concern as it could greatly affect the clinical outcome. SpineCor is a relatively new design for tackling those inevitable drawbacks found in rigid orthosis. However, there was no study to compare this design with the conventional method regarding their treatment efficacy and the patient's acceptance. Methods. Forty-three subjects with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly assigned to the SpineCor group (S group, n = 22) and rigid orthosis group (R group, n = 21). Their survival rate in the first 45 months of intervention was studied. The subjects' acceptance to the orthoses was evaluated by a purpose-designed questionnaire, which was administered in the 3rd, 9th, and 18th months of intervention. Results. In the study period, there were 68% of the subjects in the S group and 95% of the subjects in the R group did not show curve progression. Significant difference (P = 0.046, by Fisher exact test) in failure rate between the 2 subject groups was found although the 2 groups had similar responses to the questionnaire. Conclusion. The current study showed that the failure rate of the SpineCor was significantly higher than that of the rigid spinal orthosis, and the patients' acceptance to the SpineCor was comparable to the conventional rigid spinal orthosis.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/55705
ISSN: 0362-2436
EISSN: 1528-1159
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817329d9
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

49
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

Page view(s)

29
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Aug 13, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.