Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/55330
Title: Discourse intonation : a corpus-driven study of prominence on pronouns
Authors: Cheng, W 
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Source: In D Biber & R Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, p. 75-89. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2015 How to cite?
Abstract: Not everyone agrees on what exactly is covered by the term “prosody.” Prosody is considered to be all of the suprasegmental features which include changes in pitch, “loudness, timing (including pauses) and voice quality” (Wichmann 2000: 8). According to Reed (2006: 3), prosody includes intonation, pitch, loudness, and time, with loudness and time being realized “in the form of duration, tempo, speech rate, rhythm and pause,” but excludes voice quality. The reason for excluding voice quality is because voice quality is optional, and therefore paralinguistic, in the sense that a speaker uses a change in her “normal voice quality for interactionally motivated reasons” (Reed 2006: 10). Cauldwell (2013: 325) offers a rather open-ended definition of prosody, namely a “collective term for the variations in pitch, loudness, tempo, rhythm and other features of the sound substance of speech.”. There is no a general agreement on what prosody is, and the same is true for intonation, a subset of prosody. Pickering (2012: 5437) provides both a narrow and a broad definition of intonation. The narrow definition is “the linguistically significant use of pitch movement at the suprasegmental level”; the broader definition includes “the alignment of the pitch contour with phrasal or clausal groups separated by pauses.” Cauldwell (2013: 325), taking the discourse intonation perspective, defines intonation as the “overall shape of a stretch of speech as created by a speaker's use of prominence, non-prominence, key and tone.” The intonation system in English has been investigated from different approaches, depending on linguistic schools and countries (Chun 2002). A grammatical or syntactic approach to intonation views intonation as segmental (see, for example, Chomsky and Halle 1968; Liberman and Prince 1977; Pierrehumbert 1980; Pierrehumbert and Hirschberg 1990) in which the functions of intonation are inherently linked to grammatical relationships. This approach sees rule-driven generative phonology as a natural, or inevitable, way of viewing such prosodic features based on their notion of generative grammar. It is grounded on the notion that tones align with specific syntactic structures.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/55330
ISBN: 9781139764377
9781107037380
DOI: 10.1007/9781139764377.005
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.