Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4757
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering-
dc.creatorLi, CY-
dc.creatorWai, PKA-
dc.creatorLi, OKV-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:26:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:26:57Z-
dc.identifier.issn1943-0620 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn1943-0639 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4757-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOptical Society of Americaen_US
dc.rights© 2011 Optical Society of America. This paper was published in Journal of Optical Communications and Networking and is made available as an electronic reprint with the permission of OSA. The paper can be found at the following URL on the OSA website: http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?uri=jocn-3-2-104. Systematic or multiple reproduction or distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.en_US
dc.subjectControl overheaden_US
dc.subjectOffset timeen_US
dc.subjectOptical burst switchingen_US
dc.titlePerformance improvement methods for Burst-switched networksen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: C. Y. Lien_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: P. K. A. Waien_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Victor O.-K. Lien_US
dc.identifier.spage104-
dc.identifier.epage116-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1364/JOCN.3.000104-
dcterms.abstractIn this paper, we present a performance model of optical burst switching (OBS) that can explain the degradation of OBS throughput performance when the control packet processing time increases. We then use the proposed performance model to investigate three feasible methods to improve OBS performance without significantly increasing the implementation complexity: addition of simple fiber delay lines (FDLs), random extra offset time, and window-based channel scheduling (WBS). Additional FDLs can eliminate the negative impact caused by the variation of the offset time between control packets and data bursts. The random extra offset time approach does not require any additional hardware and computational capability in the nodes. If higher computational capability is available, WBS in general can provide better throughput improvement than that of random extra offset time when FDLs are used in the nodes to compensate the processing time. Simulation results show that a combination of the proposed methods can significantly improve OBS performance.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of optical communications and networking, 1 Feb. 2011, v. 3, no. 2, p. 104-116-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of optical communications and networking-
dcterms.issued2011-02-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288459900001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79952988331-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr52195-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Li_Performance_improvement_methods.pdf798.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

112
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

154
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.