Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4551
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorChan, JHL-
dc.creatorChan, DWM-
dc.creatorLam, TIP-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:23:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:23:16Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-2772-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4551-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rightsFacilities © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectContract costsen_US
dc.subjectGuaranteed maximum price contractsen_US
dc.subjectProcurementen_US
dc.subjectRisk allocationen_US
dc.subjectTarget cost contractsen_US
dc.titlePreferred risk allocation in target cost contracts in constructionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Patrick T. I. Lamen_US
dc.identifier.spage542-
dc.identifier.epage562-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue13/14-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/02632771111178364-
dcterms.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the party most preferred to take the risks associated with the target cost contracts and guaranteed maximum price contracts (TCC/GMP) in the Hong Kong context.-
dcterms.abstractDesign/methodology/approach – An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted with the relevant industrial practitioners to solicit their preferences of risk allocation in TCC/GMP construction projects in Hong Kong.-
dcterms.abstractFindings – The survey findings indicated that risks on tender documentation and project design are better borne by clients, while construction related risks are perceived to be taken by contractors. The research findings are consistent with other similar studies on risk allocation in construction projects in general.-
dcterms.abstractPractical implications – This paper has developed a preferred risk allocation scheme for the delivery of future TCC/GMP projects, taking Hong Kong as an example. It can serve as a useful guide for decision makers to determine an optimal risk allocation at the planning stage of a TCC/GMP scheme.-
dcterms.abstractOriginality/value – The paper can benefit both academic researchers and industrial practitioners in generating an equitable risk sharing mechanism for TCC/GMP projects. It provides sufficient empirical evidence, added to the growing body of knowledge and lays a solid foundation for further research such as an international comparison of various risk allocation schemes associated with this kind of contractual arrangement.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFacilities, 2011, v. 29, no. 13/14, p. 542-562-
dcterms.isPartOfFacilities-
dcterms.issued2011-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80054844918-
dc.identifier.eissn1758-7131-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr59967-
dc.description.ros2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PolyU IR Submission 2011_FACILITIES_1.pdfPre-published version187.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

240
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

871
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.