Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4530
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Chinese Culture | - |
| dc.creator | Chak, CS | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:27:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:27:05Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0073-375x | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4530 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh | en_US |
| dc.publisher | 新亞硏究所 | en_US |
| dc.rights | ©新亞學報 2011, 新亞研究所授權轉載 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 王國維 | en_US |
| dc.title | 王國維尋死原因三說質疑 | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 155 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 196 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | 王國維為何投湖自盡一直都是一個聚訟不休的議題。 這些議論又足可大率歸為四大類。亦即: (一)殉清說、(二)討債逼死說、(三)殉文化說、(四)紅色恐怖逼死說。前三種說法分別在不同的歷史時段主宰了話語的霸權。殉清說是民國時期的主流論述，討債逼死就是中共立國至文革時期的主流論述，殉文化說是文革時期的主流論述，而紅色恐怖逼死說則一直被驅逐到話語的邊陲。本文的主要努力，在於質疑殉清說、討債逼死說和殉文化說，是如何經不起事實、常識和邏輯的檢驗，以為紅色恐怖逼死說的確立，掃除主要的障礙。 | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | 新亞學報 (New Asia journal), Mar. 2011, v. 29, p. 155-196 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | 新亞學報 (New Asia journal) | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2011-03 | - |
| dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r54905 | - |
| dc.description.ros | 2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 翟_王國維_尋死_原因.pdf | 8.96 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks 
Page views
282
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
612
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.