Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4485
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorYu, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn2356-6140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4485-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rights© 2010 with authoren_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subjectPositive youth development programen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectSubject outcome evaluationen_US
dc.subjectChinese adolescentsen_US
dc.titleSubjective outcome evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. : descriptive profiles and correlatesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage211en_US
dc.identifier.epage223en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1100/tsw.2010.23en_US
dcterms.abstractA total of 196 schools participated in the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 2 curriculum) of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) in Hong Kong. After the completion of the program, 1,178 instructors completed a subjective outcome evaluation form in order to assess their views of the program, instructors, and perceived effectiveness of the program. Results showed that high proportions of the instructors had positive perceptions of the program (range: 76.79–93.69%) and their own performance (range: 83.20–98.60%), and most of the respondents (range: 78.45–92.43%) regarded the program as helpful to the program participants. While the ratings in some items in the present findings were relatively better than those in the Experimental Implementation Phase, they were similar to those based on the Secondary 1 curriculum. Consistent with previous studies, the ratings on the program, instructors, and perceived effectiveness were significantly correlated.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe scientific world journal, 2010, v. 10, p. 211-223en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe scientific world journalen_US
dcterms.issued2010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000274472300005-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77749316147-
dc.identifier.pmid20155237-
dc.identifier.eissn1537-744Xen_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr46157-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Record-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0636-n187-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
241012.pdf720.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

84
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

18
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.