Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4472
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Applied Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.creator | Shek, DTL | en_US |
dc.creator | Ma, HK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:24:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:24:14Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2356-6140 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4472 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2010 with author | en_US |
dc.rights | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
dc.subject | Program evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Positive youth development | en_US |
dc.subject | Replication | en_US |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject | Adolescents | en_US |
dc.title | Editorial: Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong : are the findings replicable across different populations? | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 178 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 181 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1100/tsw.2010.20 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Existing youth enhancement programs commonly deal with isolated problems and issues in adolescent development and they are relatively short-term in nature. To promote holistic development among adolescents in Hong Kong, we launched Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes (P.A.T.H.S.). One unique characteristic of the Project P.A.T.H.S. is systematic evaluation of the program using various evaluation strategies. In this special issue, comprising 8 research articles, we have applied the principle of replication to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the Programs, including subjective outcome evaluation based on program participants and implementers, evaluation based on secondary data evaluation, and objective outcome evaluation. Generally speaking, the findings are consistent with those reported previously, thus providing evidence for the replication of related research findings. These replicated findings generally suggest that different stakeholders have positive perceptions of the program, workers and benefits of the program and there is evidence supporting the effectiveness of the program. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | - |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | The scientific world journal, 2010, v. 10, p. 178-181 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | The scientific world journal | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000274472300001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-77749328371 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20155234 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1537-744X | en_US |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r47390 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | - |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0636-n183 | - |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
256532.pdf | 81.63 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
140
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
28
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
33
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Apr 5, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.