Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4472
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorMa, HKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:14Z-
dc.identifier.issn2356-6140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4472-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rights© 2010 with authoren_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subjectProgram evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPositive youth developmenten_US
dc.subjectReplicationen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.titleEditorial: Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong : are the findings replicable across different populations?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage178en_US
dc.identifier.epage181en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1100/tsw.2010.20en_US
dcterms.abstractExisting youth enhancement programs commonly deal with isolated problems and issues in adolescent development and they are relatively short-term in nature. To promote holistic development among adolescents in Hong Kong, we launched Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes (P.A.T.H.S.). One unique characteristic of the Project P.A.T.H.S. is systematic evaluation of the program using various evaluation strategies. In this special issue, comprising 8 research articles, we have applied the principle of replication to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the Programs, including subjective outcome evaluation based on program participants and implementers, evaluation based on secondary data evaluation, and objective outcome evaluation. Generally speaking, the findings are consistent with those reported previously, thus providing evidence for the replication of related research findings. These replicated findings generally suggest that different stakeholders have positive perceptions of the program, workers and benefits of the program and there is evidence supporting the effectiveness of the program.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe scientific world journal, 2010, v. 10, p. 178-181en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe scientific world journalen_US
dcterms.issued2010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000274472300001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77749328371-
dc.identifier.pmid20155234-
dc.identifier.eissn1537-744Xen_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr47390-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Record-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0636-n183-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
256532.pdf81.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

140
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

28
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.