Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4471
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorMa, CMSen_US
dc.creatorSun, RCFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:11Z-
dc.identifier.issn2356-6140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/4471-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rights© 2010 with authoren_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subjectSubjective outcome evaluationen_US
dc.subjectSecondary data analysisen_US
dc.subjectProgram evaluationen_US
dc.subjectProject P.A.T.H.S.en_US
dc.subjectChinese adolescents with greater psychosocial needsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a positive youth development program for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs : integrated views of program implementersen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1890en_US
dc.identifier.epage1900en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1100/tsw.2010.160en_US
dcterms.abstractTo help adolescents with greater psychosocial needs, the Tier 2 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) was designed and implemented by school social workers and teachers. Based on subjective outcome evaluation data collected from the program participants (n = 2,542) in 49 schools, program implementers were invited to write down five conclusions based on an integration of the evaluation findings. With reference to 245 conclusions included in the 49 evaluation reports, secondary data analyses showed that most of the conclusions concerning perceptions of the Tier 2 Program, instructors, and program effectiveness were positive. In addition, difficulties encountered and recommendations for program improvement were highlighted. In conjunction with previous evaluation findings, the present study suggests that the Tier 2 Program was well received and was perceived to be beneficial to the development of adolescents with greater psychosocial needs.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe scientific world journal, 2010, v. 10, p. 1890-1900en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe scientific world journalen_US
dcterms.issued2010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000282434400001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78349249388-
dc.identifier.pmid20890578-
dc.identifier.eissn1537-744Xen_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr55532-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Record-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0636-n182-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
702638.pdf420.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

28
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.