Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40870
Title: Auditors' response to analysts' forecast properties : some evidence from audit pricing
Authors: Foo, Yin Yen William
Advisors: Bliss, Mark Anthony Gerard (AF)
Keywords: Auditing.
Auditors.
Business forecasting.
Business enterprises -- Finance.
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Abstract: This study draws on information asymmetry theory and audit pricing theory to examine the link between analyst earnings forecasts and audit pricing in the U.S. For the empirical tests, information asymmetry is measured in two ways: (1) the lag of analysts' forecast accuracy (LAGACCY), and (2) the lag of analysts' forecast dispersion (LAGDSP). Using data from 2000 to 2012, this thesis finds that higher analyst earnings forecast accuracy (dispersion) is associated with lower (higher) audit fees. These findings are consistent with the theory that analysts, as important financial intermediaries, provide useful information to third parties, including auditors. Further, the results suggest that these associations are stronger (1) for small firms, and (2) for younger firms, consistent with theory that such firms have higher information asymetry. Finally, it is found that the association between audit fees and LAGACCY and LAGDSP are insignificant for firms that are audited by industry specialists. This finding provides support that auditor industry specialization plays a part in reducing information asymetry with these audit firm types being less reliant on information provided by financial analysts.
Description: PolyU Library Call No.: [THS] LG51 .H577P AF 2015 Foo
167 pages :color illustrations
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40870
Rights: All rights reserved.
Appears in Collections:Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
b28292625_link.htmFor PolyU Users208 BHTMLView/Open
b28292625_ira.pdfFor All Users (Non-printable)1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

51
Last Week
2
Last month
Checked on May 21, 2017

Download(s)

29
Checked on May 21, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.