Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40868
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorZhang, C-
dc.creatorPeng, G-
dc.creatorWang, X-
dc.creatorWang, WSY-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-26T02:51:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-26T02:51:09Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-85261-941-4 (online)-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-85261-942-1 (USB)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/40868-
dc.description18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 10-14 Aug 2015, SECC, Glasgow, Scotland, UKen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Glasgowen_US
dc.rightsAccording to a recent decision by the Permanent Council for the Organization of the International Congresses of Phonetic Sciences, the Proceedings of ICPhS 2015 will be posted on the IPA online public archive of ICPhS conference papers, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). This means that the work must be attributed to the author (BY clause), no one can use the work commercially (NC clause), and the work cannot be modified by anyone who re-uses it (ND clause).en_US
dc.rightsThe Creative Commons is located at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.subjectContext effecten_US
dc.subjectTalker normalizationen_US
dc.subjectSpeech perceptionen_US
dc.subjectLexical toneen_US
dc.subjectCantoneseen_US
dc.titleCumulative effects of phonetic context on speech perceptionen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.abstractDifferent speakers produce speech sounds differently. The phonetic context is known to facilitate the recovering of phonological categories from productions with talker variation. However, whether the context effect originates from central auditory processing or speech-related processing remains debated. It is worth noting that the context effect may be a combined effect, contributed by both auditory and speech-related processing. To investigate this question, we compared the effect of four types of contexts with incrementally more cues (nonspeech, reversed speech, meaningless speech and meaningful speech) on perception of Cantonese level tones. Results indicate that the context effect is a product of multiple levels of processing, with the primary contribution from phonological cues (meaningless speech context). The contribution of auditory cues is negligible, and that of phonetic cues and semantic+syntactic cues is both moderate. Phonological cues likely enable listeners to calibrate the acoustic-to-phonological mapping of speech sounds for each talker, facilitating the categorization.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4. Paper number 0085.1-5 retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0085.pdf-
dcterms.issued2015-09-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2015000279-
dc.description.ros2015-2016 > Academic research: refereed > Refereed conference paper-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ICPhS_2015_CCZhang.pdf378.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

182
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

72
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.