Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/39973
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | - |
dc.creator | Chang, H | - |
dc.creator | Zheng, LY | - |
dc.creator | Ji, SR | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-17T10:08:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-17T10:08:42Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1006-9771 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/39973 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh | en_US |
dc.publisher | 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社 | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2003 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research use. | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2003 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。 | en_US |
dc.subject | Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) | en_US |
dc.subject | Heel pain | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on managing heel pain | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 442 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 444 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dcterms.abstract | 目的观察体外冲击波治疗跟痛症的疗效。方法 2 2例患者被随机分为治疗组 12例和对照组 10例 ,治疗组采用体外冲击波治疗 3周 ,治疗前、治疗中每周、治疗后、治疗后 3周 ,采用目测类比定级法 (VAS)评定患者双足负重时疼痛的强度 ,包括 :起床时、持续行走或站立后、足底牵拉及足跟受压时 ;每次评定时 ,记录患者 1周内最长可持续行走或站立的时间。采用MayoClin icalScoringSystem (MCSS)足部功能评定法评定患者的整体功能水平。 结果与对照组相比 ,治疗组足底牵拉检查指数 (P <0 0 5 )及足底受压检查指数 (P <0 0 1)减小、患者最长可持续行走或站立时间延长 (P <0 0 5 )、MCSS足部功能评定分值增加 (P <0 0 5 )。结论体外冲击波治疗跟痛症疗效显著 ,且维持时间长。 | - |
dcterms.abstract | ObjectiveTo observe the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on managing heel pain. Methods22 patients were divided into 2 groups,12 cases in treatment group who accepted ESWT, 10 cases in control group.The intensity of morning pain on weight bearing, pain triggered by prolonged walking/standing, pain on tension and palpation tests were assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after each treatment session, including the follow-up session,3 weeks after treatment. In addition, Mayo Clinical Scoring System (MCSS) was used to evaluate the treatment outcomes. ResultsAfter 3 weeks of treatment and 3 weeks’ follow-up, the intensity of pain on tension test(P<0.05)as well as that on palpation test (P<0.01)decreased, the maximum duration of prolonged walking or standing (P<0.05)and MCSS scores (P<0.05)improved. Conclusions ESWT seems to be a more effective treatment modality for managing heel pain. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.alternative | 体外冲击波治疗跟痛症 | - |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | 中国康复理论与实践 (Chinese journal of rehabalitation theory & practice), 2003, v. 9, no. 7, p. 442-444 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | 中国康复理论与实践 (Chinese journal of rehabalitation theory & practice) | - |
dcterms.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r18591 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2003-2004 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
r18591.pdf | 109.4 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
86
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
117
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.