Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/3995
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorChan, DWM-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.creatorLam, TIP-
dc.creatorWong, JMW-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:28:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:28:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-7863-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/3995-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rightsInternational Journal of Project Management © 2010 Elsevier. The journal web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com.en_US
dc.subjectGuaranteed maximum priceen_US
dc.subjectTarget cost contractingen_US
dc.subjectMotivesen_US
dc.subjectBenefitsen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.titleAn empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in constructionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Patrick T. I. Lamen_US
dc.identifier.spage577-
dc.identifier.epage590-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.002-
dcterms.abstractIn light of increasing project complexity, constraints on programme schedule and limited budget, there exists a strong call for changes in contracting procedures in construction. Both the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) and Target Cost Contracting (TCC) approaches with a gain-share/pain-share arrangement have been advocated to achieve better value for money and more satisfactory project performance. This paper aims to review the prevailing practices of GMP/TCC in general, and explore the motives and benefits of implementing the GMP/TCC scheme in comparison with the traditional fixed-price lump-sum contract in particular. The research study is based on a comprehensive literature review and an industry-wide empirical questionnaire survey for evaluating the relative importance of motives and benefits associated with GMP/TCC in Hong Kong. The survey data collected from 45 valid completed questionnaires were analysed using the mean score ranking technique, Kendall's concordance test, Spearman's rank correlation test and one-way ANOVA test. The perceived benefits were measured and ranked from the perspectives of the client, contractor and consultant for cross-comparison. The survey findings indicated that the three most common motives of clients behind their decision of adopting GMP/TCC include: (1) to generate an incentive for contractor to achieve cost saving; (2) to develop better working relationship within the project team; and (3) to tap in contractor's expertise in design and innovation. The top three perceived benefits of applying GMP/TCC were found to be: (1) early settlement of final project account; (2) improved partners' working relationship under a partnering arrangement; and (3) capability of integrating contractor's expertise in building designs and innovations prior to construction. The research results are particularly essential in assisting key project stakeholders to realise the potential benefits derived from the use of GMP/TCC contracts and in generating more useful insights into alternative integrated contracting strategies for the construction industry, so as to drive for excellence in overall project performance.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of project management, July 2011, v. 29, no. 5, p. 577-590-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of project management-
dcterms.issued2011-07-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000291960900010-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955958592-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4634-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr61235-
dc.description.ros2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PolyU IR Submission 2011_IJPM_1.pdfPre-published version457.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

199
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

324
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.