Back to results list
Show full item record
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Clinical performance of defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses for myopia control|
|Authors:||Lam, CSY |
|Source:||IMC 2010 13th International Myopia Conference 2010, July 26-29, 2010, Tubingen, Germany How to cite?|
|Abstract:||Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of a special designed Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) Lenses for myopia control trial.|
Methods: Thirty-two myopic (-1 to -5D with astigmatism less than 1D) Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren aged between 9 to 15 years were recruited. They were randomly selected from the subject pool of our on-going ‘myopia control study’ using the DISC lenses. The DISC lens is a custom-made bifocal (with 2.5D addition power) soft contact lens which provides simultaneous vision for both distance and near. The near zone incorporates constant myopic defocus for all viewing distances. Half of them wore the DISC lenses and the other half wore single vision (SV) lenses with same materials. Lens evaluation was performed for each subject after 30 minutes of lens wear. Clinical performance was assessed for their right eyes in terms of lens fitting performance (centration, primary gaze movement, movement with blink, lens tightness), physiology parameters (limbal and bulbar redness, corneal and conjunctival staining), subjective perception (ratings of comfort and vision, grade 1-4) and visual performance among individuals. Assessment on visual performance include: distance visual acuities (VA) and contrast sensitivities (CS) with different contrasts (100%, 25%, 10% and 5%) under photopic and scotopic conditions, high contrast and low contrast near VA. Each subject were given a break and then switched to wear the other lens type on the same eye. Measurements were repeated after 30 minutes of lens adaptation. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Lens fitting performance, physiology parameters and subjective perception of lens comfort were very similar for both lens types (p>0.05). Overall satisfaction of vision with lenses was graded by the subjects on a scale from 1-5 (1-very poor, 2-poor 3- fair; 4-good, 5-excellent). The mean grades for both lens types was good DISC lens = 4.13, SV lens = 4.81) although the subjects found slightly better vision with SV lenses than the DISC lenses. There was no significant difference between two lens types in high contrast near VA, but a significant difference showed in low contrast near VA (p<0.0001). The distance VA of various contrast levels was significantly better for SV lens than the DISC lens under both photopic and scotopic conditions. The mean differences of 10 % and 5% (p <0.0001) low contrast distance VA were 0.09 and 0.16 logMAR units (about 1 to 1.5 lines). The mean differences of 100% (p = 0.001) contrast and 25% (p<0.0001) contrast levels were only 0.03 and 0.04 logMAR units (1.5 to 2 letters) respectively, and this was not likely to be clinically significant.
Discussion and Conclusions: The DISC lens shows similar clinical performance with single vision lens in most aspects except low contrast VA. Overall performance indicates the DISC lens can be prescribed for schoolchildren.
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Paper|
Show full item record
Checked on Aug 20, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.