Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/3668
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorChan, JHL-
dc.creatorChan, DWM-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.creatorLam, TIP-
dc.creatorYeung, FY-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:25:04Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:25:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn1472-5967-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/3668-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rightsJournal of Facilities Management © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectContractsen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectTarget costsen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a fuzzy risk assessment model for guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in constructionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Patrick T. I. Lamen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: John F. Y. Yeungen_US
dc.identifier.spage34-
dc.identifier.epage51-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/14725961111105709-
dcterms.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for construction projects procured with target cost contracts (TCC) and guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts using factor analysis (FA) and fuzzy synthetic evaluation method, based on an empirical questionnaire survey with relevant industrial practitioners in Hong Kong.-
dcterms.abstractDesign/methodology/approach – A total of 34 key risk factors (RFs) inherent with TCC/GMP contracts were identified through an extensive literature review and a series of structured interviews. A questionnaire survey was then launched to solicit the opinions of industrial practitioners on risk assessment of such RFs.-
dcterms.abstractFindings – The most important 17 principal RFs after the calculation of normalised values were selected for undertaking FA. Five principal risk groups (PRGs) were then generated in descending order of importance as: design risks, pre-contract risks, economic and financial risks, lack of experience in TCC/GMP procurement process and post-contract risks. These survey findings also reveal that design risks may be the major hurdle to the success of TCC/GMP projects in Hong Kong.-
dcterms.abstractOriginality/value – An overall risk index (ORI) associated with TCC/GMP construction projects and the risk indices of individual PRGs can be generated from the model for reference. An objective and reliable assessment can be achieved. The model provides a solid platform to measure, evaluate and reduce the risk levels of TCC/GMP projects based on objective evidence instead of subjective judgments. The research methodology could be replicated in other countries or regions to produce similar models for international comparisons and the assessment of risk levels for different types of TCC/GMP projects worldwide.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of facilities management, 2011, v. 9 no. 1, p. 34-51-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of facilities management-
dcterms.issued2011-02-
dc.identifier.eissn1741-0983-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr51507-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PolyU IR Submission 2011_JFM_1.pdfPre-published version181.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

141
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

365
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.