Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/3657
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorChan, EA-
dc.creatorChung, J-
dc.creatorWong, TKS-
dc.creatorYang, JCS-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:58Z-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/3657-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.rights© 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Engle Angela Chan, et al., An evaluation of nursing practice models in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Hong Kong: a preliminary study, Journal of Clinical Nursing, June 2006, v.15, no. 6, which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01345.x.en_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectInfection control practice and educationen_US
dc.subjectNurses' viewsen_US
dc.subjectNursing delivery modelsen_US
dc.subjectSARSen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of nursing practice models in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Hong Kong : a preliminary studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Joanne W. Y. Chungen_US
dc.identifier.spage661-
dc.identifier.epage670-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01345.x-
dcterms.abstractAim and objective. Like other health-care workers, Hong Kong nurses had their professional knowledge and skills seriously challenged during the SARS outbreak. Could current nursing practices support the care of SARS or SARS-like patients in the future? If not, alternative practices would be needed. Providing a preliminary understanding, this paper compares the conventional with different nursing delivery models in a simulated SARS ward and focuses on nurses’ efficiency, infection control practices and views of the two models.-
dcterms.abstractDesign and methods. This study was conducted in three phases. First, a baseline understanding of nursing practices was achieved through four workflow observations. In an eight-hour day, four research assistants observed nursing activities in the medical and fever wards. These data were used in the second phase to construct two sets of clinical vignettes, pertaining to SARS patient care in both conventional and alternative practice models. These scripts were discussed with nine nurses of various ranks from the hospital under study for their expert validation and input. In the third phase, nurse participants and patient actors enacted the vignettes in a simulated setting. Video-taped observations and four nurse participant interviews were employed. Observational data were analysed through descriptive statistics and independent t-tests. Textual data were coded and categorized for common meanings.-
dcterms.abstractResults. Conventional practice from the findings consisted of cubicle and named nurse nursing. While the former reflected modified team and functional nursing, it did not confine patient care within a cubicle as suggested by its name. The latter depicted a modified primary nursing approach in a team, with delegation of care. Preliminary findings concerning infection control and nurse satisfaction revealed that the alternative model had an advantage over the conventional.-
dcterms.abstractRelevance to clinical practice. This study findings lay the foundation for clinical trials, which would evaluate the significance of patient-care quality, cost-effectiveness and better human resource management by restructuring current nursing practices.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of clinical nursing, June 2006, v. 15, no. 6, p. 661-670-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of clinical nursing-
dcterms.issued2006-06-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000237422100002-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745645637-
dc.identifier.pmid16684161-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2702-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr34329-
dc.description.ros2006-2007 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Originalen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Model study for JCN revised May 2005 (3).pdfPreprint version98.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

140
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

353
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.