Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Documentary evidence as hegemonic reconstruction
Authors: Cheng, L
Cheng, W 
Keywords: documentary evidence; legal narrative; hegemonic construction; manipulation
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: De Gruyter
Source: Semiotica : journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, 2014, v. 2014, no. 200, p. 165-184 How to cite?
Journal: Semiotica : journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies
Abstract: The paper aims to explore documentary evidence in legal discourse from a socio-semiotic perspective and argues there is reconstructive and deconstructive nature in legal narratives and the hegemony in legal narratives can be regarded as conventional. Based on case studies relevant to Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance in Hong Kong, the paper finds that spatial manipulation and voice manipulation were employed as strategies by court to create legal hegemony in narratives. Unraveling such strategies helps to deconstruct legal hegemony. The paper concludes that documentary evidence is characterized by the essential features of a sign, which can be subject to the influence of spatial and temporal manipulations, because such kind of evidence is subject to multiple interpretations.
ISSN: 0037-1998 (print)
1613-3692 (online)
DOI: 10.1515/sem-2014-0009
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jun 21, 2017

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Checked on Jun 25, 2017

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.