Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting
Authors: Cho, P 
Lam, AK 
Mountford, J
Ng, L
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Source: Optometry and vision science, 2002, v. 79, no. 3, p. 175-183 How to cite?
Journal: Optometry and vision science 
Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the performances of Humphrey Atlas 991, Orbscan II, Dicon CT200, Medmont E300 on young Chinese adults.
METHODS: Three sets of corneal topography measurements were obtained from each topographer from 22 subjects-two sets by the same examiner and one set by another examiner on the same day.
RESULTS: There were no significant within-examiner and between-examiner differences for any of the parameters tested for each topographer. However, only the repeatability and reproducibility (of apical radius[Ro], eccentricity, and elevation) of the Humphrey and Medmont were good. There was no statistically significant between-topographer difference in R(o), but significant differences in eccentricity and elevation values were found. The number of repeated readings that should be taken for a precision of 2 microm (elevation) were 12 for the Humphrey and 2 for the Medmont.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both the Humphrey and the Medmont was very good. R(o) and eccentricity values of different topographers cannot be used interchangeably, but the agreement in elevation values was good for these topographers. The number of repeated readings required for maximum precision varies with the topographer used, and they are not interchangeable.
ISSN: 1040-5488
EISSN: 1538-9235
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200203000-00012
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 9, 2018


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 17, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.