Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/34658
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketing-
dc.creatorSnape, E-
dc.creatorChan, AW-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-29T02:55:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-29T02:55:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn0019-8676-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/34658-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.titleCommitment to company and union : evidence from Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage445-
dc.identifier.epage459-
dc.identifier.volume39-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/0019-8676.00175-
dcterms.abstractThis article examines the pattern and antecedents of employee commitment to company and union in the Hong Kong context. Findings are consistent with those from the United States. In general, company and union commitment have different antecedents, although the perceived industrial relations climate is a common predictor. Dual commitment is in evidence. Union membership is a function of union commitment. The findings caution against attempts to explain the pattern of Hong Kong industrial relations purely in terms of culture.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIndustrial relations, 2000, v. 39, no. 3, p. 445-459-
dcterms.isPartOfIndustrial relations-
dcterms.issued2000-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-232X-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr01992-
dc.description.ros2000-2001 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Aug 19, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 24, 2020

Page view(s)

147
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 21, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.