Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/34568
Title: Comparability of self-reported conscientiousness across 21 countries
Authors: Mottus, R
Allik, J
Realo, A
Pullmann, H
Rossier, J
Zecca, G
Ah-Kion, J
Amoussou-Yeye, D
Backstrom, M
Barkauskiene, R
Barry, O
Bhowon, U
Bjorklund, F
Bouchaver, A
Bochaver, K
De Bruin, GP
Cabrera, HF
Chen, SX 
Church, AT
Cisse, DD
Dahourou, D
Feng, X
Guan, Y
Hwang, HS
Idris, F
Katigbak, MS
Kuppens, P
Kwiatkowska, A
Laurinavicius, A
Mastor, KA
Matsumoto, D
Riemann, R
Schug, J
Simpson, B
Ng Tseung, C
Keywords: Anchoring vignettes
Reference group effect
DIF
Cross-cultural
Aggregate personality scores
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Wiley
Source: European journal of personality, 2012, v. 26, no. 3, p. 303-317 How to cite?
Journal: European journal of personality
Abstract: In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/34568
ISSN: 1099-0984
DOI: 10.1002/per.840
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
Citations as of Apr 30, 2016

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Feb 18, 2017

Page view(s)

14
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Feb 19, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.