Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/34427
Title: Environment and body contamination : a comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing
Authors: Guo, YP
Li, Y 
Wong, PL
Keywords: Isolation gown/apron
CDC protocol
Cross infection
Fluorescent stain
Training
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: American journal of infection control, 2014, v. 42, no. 4, p. e-39-e-45 How to cite?
Journal: American journal of infection control
Abstract: Background: This study aimed to examine the body contamination rates and environmental contamination levels during the removal of 3 types of personal protective clothing (PPC) by the individual accustomed removal method (IARM) and gown removal methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Methods: Fifty participants performed IARM and CDC-recommended gown removal methods to remove 3 types of PPC (ie, cotton gown, water resistant gown, and plastic apron) in random order at 2 separate sessions after applying Glo Germ simulated germ lotion on the gown's surface. A video demonstrating the CDC-recommended gown removal method was shown between the 2 sessions. After PPC removal, fluorescent stains were counted by an ultraviolet scan under dim light.
Results: Following IARM, contaminants were splashed in the surroundings, particularly on the front part of the subject. The plastic apron and cotton gown obtained the highest and lowest contaminative hazards, respectively, to the hands, shoes, and environment. Females, nurses, and senior staff had serious hand or shoe contamination. The CDC removal method more significantly reduced body and environmental contamination of small fluorescent stains (<1 cm2), but not of large patches (>1 cm2), than IARM.
Conclusion: The effect of gown removal, PPC type, discarding PPC location, training of infection control measures, hand hygiene, and special work shoes should be considered daily.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/34427
ISSN: 0196-6553 (print)
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Feb 19, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Feb 19, 2017

Page view(s)

14
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Feb 19, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.