Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/33496
Title: The informativeness of analyst forecast revisions and the valuation of R&D-intensive firms
Authors: Huang, Y 
Zhang, G
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Elsevier Science Inc
Source: Journal of accounting and public policy, 2011, v. 30, no. 1, p. 1-21 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 
Abstract: Prior studies (e.g., McNichols and O'Brien, 1997; Diether et al., 2002) find that analysts are less willing to disclose unfavorable earnings forecasts than to disclose favorable forecasts, and this tendency induces an optimistic bias in disclosed forecasts that increases with the degree of earnings uncertainty. Building on these findings, we predict that, in the context of R&D-intensive industries, there should be differential informativeness and asymmetric valuation roles for upward versus downward analyst forecast revisions. Consistent with our predictions, we find the following evidence: (i) analyst forecast revisions contain a downward bias, causing upward revisions to under-represent, whereas downward revisions to over-represent, changes in true earnings expectations, with the extent of over/under-representation greater for firms with higher R&D expenditures; (ii) upward revisions are associated with more rapid reductions in earnings uncertainties (proxied by forecast dispersions) than downward revisions, mainly for high R&D firms; and (iii) upward revisions are more effective in mitigating the return differentials between high and low R&D firms (as documented in Chan et al., 2001).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/33496
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.004
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Jul 29, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 14, 2017

Page view(s)

43
Last Week
5
Last month
Checked on Aug 21, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.