Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/32093
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorKo, FS-
dc.creatorSiu, AM-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T06:58:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-22T06:58:27Z-
dc.identifier.issn2191-1231-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/32093-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbHen_US
dc.subjectAssessing emotions scaleen_US
dc.subjectEmotional intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectFactor analysisen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.titleValidation of a Chinese version of the Assessing Emotions Scale for measuring the emotional intelligence of Chinese adolescentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ijdhd-2013-0017-
dcterms.abstractThis study set out to validate a Chinese-translated version of the widely used Assessing Emotion Scale (C-AES) for use in measuring the emotional intelligence of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. The convenience sample consisted of 1550 secondary students aged 12–19 years, who were asked to complete the C-AES, the Chinese Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Chinese Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and a test of facial expression recognition. The results suggest a stable four-factor model for the C-AES, comprising the factors of Appraisal of Emotion (AE), Facilitation of Thought (FT), Regulation of Emotion (RE), and Facilitation of Relationships (FR). The test-retest reliability estimates of the factor subscales were good, while the estimates of internal consistency were fair to acceptable. The results largely supported the convergent validity of the C-AES, since its subscales showed significant correlation with convergent measures of empathy and negative emotional states. In general, girls demonstrated higher emotional intelligence (EI) than boys, with a large difference noted in the FR subscale. In summary, the C-AES has demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and good test-retest reliability for use in the self-report assessment of EI.-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal on disability and human development-
dcterms.issued2013-
dc.identifier.eissn2191-0367-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr69485-
dc.description.ros2013-2014 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

173
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.