Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/30307
Title: Gender differences in pain responses to calibrated noxious heat stimuli : a sensory decision theory analysis
Authors: Chung, JWY
Wong, TKS
Clark, CWC
Keywords: Chinese
Discriminability
Report criterion
Sensory decision theory
Issue Date: 2004
Source: Pain clinic, 2004, v. 16, no. 2, p. 131-137 How to cite?
Journal: Pain Clinic 
Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to examine how differences in male and female pain responses are using the sensory decision theory. Methods: This study compared two independent samples of volunteer healthy subjects (males and females). Sensory decision theory (SDT) was used to distinguish between discriminability, P(A), and report criterion, B. Discriminability is the sensory component of pain, while report criterion represents the attitudinal components of pain. A pain generator generated thermal stimuli. Each subject received 10 stimuli at 36°C, 10 stimuli at 39°C, 10 stimuli at 42°C, 10 stimuli at 45°C, 10 stimuli at 47°C and 10 stimuli at 49°C. Immediately after each thermal stimulus, subjects were asked to report on the intensity of the stimulus on a scale of descriptors. Results: One hundred subjects (50 male and 50 female) participated in the study. The mean age was 26.9 (SD = 4.21). The thermal stimuli were grouped into high and low intensity blocks for data analysis. There was no difference in discriminability to high and intensity blocks for both between female and male. Females showed lower report criteria for both high and low intensity blocks than males and females were less stoical. Significant statistical differences were reported in the B high intensity blocks (t = -6.78, df = 98, p < 0.00) and B low intensity blocks (t = -6.92, df = 98, p < 0.00). Conclusions: The study demonstrated differences in report criterion among females compared to males. It raised the question of whether this accounts for gender differences in pain prevalence. Further studies are warranted.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/30307
ISSN: 0169-1112
DOI: 10.1163/156856904774134325
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Feb 20, 2017

Page view(s)

18
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Feb 19, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.