Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29807
Title: Conflict management styles : the differences among the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans
Authors: Kim, TY
Wang, C
Kondo, M
Kim, TH
Keywords: China
Conflict management
Japan
National cultures
Organizational conflict
South Korea
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Source: International journal of conflict management, 2007, v. 18, no. 1, p. 23-41 How to cite?
Journal: International Journal of Conflict Management 
Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine how the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans resolve an interpersonal conflict with their supervisors and how cultural factors explain the differences in conflict management styles. Design/methodology/approach - A survey was conducted involving 275 employees from China, Japan and South Korea. A hierarchical regression analysis and A-matrix hypothesis test were used to analyze the data. Findings - Koreans, compared with the Chinese and Japanese, were more likely to use a compromise style. In addition, the Japanese, compared with the Chinese and Koreans, were less likely to dominate and were more likely to oblige their supervisors. The country differences in obliging and dominating styles were partially explained by goal emphasis (self vs collective) and concern for the self, respectively. Research limitations/implications - While limited to recalling specific incidents and self-reported responses, there is evidence that East Asians differ from each other in resolving their interpersonal conflicts with supervisors. Future research needs to examine East Asian differences in resolving an interpersonal conflict with other targets such as peers and subordinates and using other kinds of conflict management styles such as mediation and arbitration. Originality/value - This is one of few studies that have examined East Asian differences in conflict management styles.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29807
DOI: 10.1108/10444060710759309
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 26, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 29, 2017

Page view(s)

31
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on May 28, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.