Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29772
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorKe, Y-
dc.creatorWang, S-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-29T07:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-29T07:26:16Z-
dc.identifier.issn1392-3730-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/29772-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectinfrastructureen_US
dc.subjectpublic-private partnership (PPP)en_US
dc.subjectrisk managementen_US
dc.titleRisk management practice in China's Public-Private Partnership projectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage675-
dc.identifier.epage684-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/13923730.2012.723380-
dcterms.abstractProject risks were not properly managed in the many past Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects in China. Although numerous research studies have been conducted on risk management in China's PPP projects, the realization of risk management in China's construction industry especially in PPP projects with high risk exposure and complicated contract structure has hitherto not been well studied. This paper therefore attempted to examine the current use of risk management in China's PPP projects by an empirical survey. The results indicated that the use of risk management was inadequate; qualitative risk analysis methods were preferred to quantitative and semi-quantitative methods; risk management usage in the execution was found to be much higher than in the planning, conceptual or termination stage; interviewees were unfamiliar with most of the risk identification and assessment tools. All above could be partly due to the project nature, but more fundamentally due to the local industrial culture. The absence of risk management culture was found to be the dominant factor which limited the implementation of risk management in practice. Recommendations to alleviate the difficulties of risk management were thereafter provided in this paper.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of civil engineering and management, 2012, v. 18, no. 5, p. 675-684-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of civil engineering and management-
dcterms.issued2012-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000309445300007-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84867458957-
dc.identifier.eissn1822-3605-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr67270-
dc.description.ros2012-2013 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
Last Week
0
Last month
2
Citations as of Jul 12, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Jul 10, 2020

Page view(s)

174
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Jul 13, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.