Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29690
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorQuach, WM-
dc.creatorTeng, JG-
dc.creatorChung, KF-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-30T08:37:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-30T08:37:00Z-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/29690-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectCoilingen_US
dc.subjectCold bendingen_US
dc.subjectFinite element simulationen_US
dc.subjectPress brakingen_US
dc.subjectResidual stressesen_US
dc.subjectUncoilingen_US
dc.titleFinite element predictions of residual stresses in press-braked thin-walled steel sectionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1609-
dc.identifier.epage1619-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.02.013-
dcterms.abstractResidual stresses in cold-formed sections may play a significant role in determining their behaviour and strength. Laboratory measurements of residual stresses by destructive methods are not only time-consuming but also of limited accuracy. This paper presents a finite element-based method for predicting residual stresses in press-braked thin-walled sections, which overcomes these difficulties. In this method, the effects of coiling and uncoiling are accounted for analytically, with the resulting residual stresses specified as the initial stresses in a subsequent finite element simulation of cold bending. The method provides residual stress distributions over the cross-section as well as across the thickness. Numerical results from this method are shown to agree closely with laboratory measurements, demonstrating the validity and accuracy of the method. Numerical results presented in the paper show that the maximum residual stresses in a press-braked section generally occur in the corner region and away from the surfaces, and their values can be much higher than those at the surfaces. This means that the conventional method of measuring the surface residual stresses in the laboratory and assuming a linear variation across the plate thickness may greatly underestimate the real residual stresses. The results also explain why residual stresses may differ considerably in otherwise identical sections. The method offers a powerful tool for exploring the effect of different forming parameters on the magnitude and distribution of residual stresses so that these forming parameters can be optimised.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering structures, 2006, v. 28, no. 11, p. 1609-1619-
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering structures-
dcterms.issued2006-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745936735-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr32970-
dc.description.ros2006-2007 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

53
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

44
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 21, 2020

Page view(s)

129
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Oct 27, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.