Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29398
Title: Management of the respiratory distress symptom cluster in lung cancer: a randomised controlled feasibility trial
Authors: Yorke, J
Lloyd-Williams, M
Smith, J
Blackhall, F
Harle, A
Warden, J
Ellis, J
Pilling, M
Haines, J
Luker, K
Molasiotis, A 
Keywords: Breathlessness
Cough
Dyspnoea
Fatigue
Lung cancer
Non-pharmacological intervention
Respiratory symptoms
Self-management
Symptom cluster
Symptoms
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Springer
Source: Supportive care in cancer, 2015 How to cite?
Journal: Supportive care in cancer 
Abstract: Background: Breathlessness, cough and fatigue are distressing symptoms for patients with lung cancer. There is evidence that these three symptoms form a discreet symptom cluster. This study aimed to feasibly test a new non-pharmacological intervention for the management of the Respiratory Distress Symptom Cluster (breathlessness-cough-fatigue) in lung cancer. Method: This was a multi-centre, randomised controlled non-blinded parallel group feasibility trial. Eligible patients (patients with primary lung cancer and ‘bothered’ by at least two of the three cluster symptoms) received usual care plus a multicomponent intervention delivered over two intervention training sessions and a follow-up telephone call or usual care only. Follow-up was for 12 weeks, and end-points included six numerical rating scales for breathlessness severity, Dyspnoea-12, Manchester Cough in Lung Cancer scale, FACIT-Fatigue scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Lung Cancer Symptom Scale and the EQ-5D-3L, collected at baseline, week 4 and week 12. Results: One hundred seven patients were randomised over 8 months; however, six were removed from further analysis due to protocol violations (intervention group n = 50 and control group n = 51). Of the ineligible patients (n = 608), 29 % reported either not experiencing two or more symptoms or not being ‘bothered’ by at least two symptoms. There was 29 % drop-out by week 4, and by week 12, a further two patients in the control group were lost to follow-up. A sample size calculation indicated that 122 patients per arm would be needed to detect a clinically important difference in the main outcome for breathlessness, cough and fatigue. Conclusions: The study has provided evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of a new intervention in the lung cancer population and warrants a fully powered trial before we reach any conclusions. The follow-on trial will test the hypothesis that the intervention improves symptom cluster of breathlessness, cough and fatigue better than usual care alone. Full economic evaluation will be conducted in the main trial.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/29398
ISSN: 0941-4355
EISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2810-x
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Nov 30, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Dec 12, 2017

Page view(s)

61
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.