Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Does partial occlusion promote normal binocular function?
Authors: Li, J
Thompson, B
Ding, Z
Chan, LYL
Chen, X
Yu, M
Deng, D
Hess, RF
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Source: Investigative ophthalmology and visual science, 2012, v. 53, no. 11, p. 6818-6827 How to cite?
Journal: Investigative ophthalmology and visual science 
Abstract: PURPOSE. There is growing evidence that abnormal binocular interactions play a key role in the amblyopia syndrome and represent a viable target for treatment interventions. In this context the use of partial occlusion using optical devices such as Bangerter filters as an alternative to complete occlusion is of particular interest. The aims of this study were to understand why Bangerter filters do not result in improved binocular outcomes compared to complete occlusion, and to compare the effects of Bangerter filters, optical blur and neutral density (ND) filters on normal binocular function. METHODS. The effects of four strengths of Bangerter filters (0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2) on letter and vernier acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, and interocular suppression were measured in 21 observers with normal vision. In a subset of 14 observers, the partial occlusion effects of Bangerter filters, ND filters and plus lenses on stereopsis and interocular suppression were compared. RESULTS. Bangerter filters did not have graded effect on vision and induced significant disruption to binocular function. This disruption was greater than that of monocular defocus but weaker than that of ND filters. The effect of the Bangerter filters on stereopsis was more pronounced than their effect on monocular acuity, and the induced monocular acuity deficits did not predict the induced deficits in stereopsis. CONCLUSIONS. Bangerter filters appear to be particularly disruptive to binocular function. Other interventions, such as optical defocus and those employing computer generated dichoptic stimulus presentation, may be more appropriate than partial occlusion for targeting binocular function during amblyopia treatment.
ISSN: 0146-0404
EISSN: 1552-5783
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10390
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 20, 2018


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 17, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 16, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.