Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparing chemical-enhanced washing and waste-based stabilisation approach for soil remediation
Authors: Tsang, DCW 
Yip, ACK
Keywords: Chelating agents
Industrial by-products
Metal leachability
Soil stabilisation
Soil washing
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Springer
Source: Journal of soils and sediments, 2014, p. 1-12 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of soils and sediments 
Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chemical-enhanced soil washing (with chelating agents, humic substances and inorganic acids) and soil stabilisation by inorganic industrial by-products (coal fly ash, acid mine drainage sludge and zero-valent iron) and organic resource (lignite) for timber treatment site remediation. Materials and methods: Both remediation options were assessed in terms of extraction/leaching kinetics and residual leachability (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, TCLP) of the major risk drivers, i.e. Cu and As. Results and discussion: In chemical-enhanced soil washing, chelating agents only minimised the Cu leachability. Humic substances were ineffective while inorganic acids reduced the As leachability to the detriment of the soil quality. For the waste-stabilised soil, the short-term leaching potential (72 h) and long-term TCLP leachability (9 months) revealed that Fe-/Al-/Ca-rich AMD sludge and coal fly ash sequestered As through adsorption and (co-)precipitation, while carbonaceous lignite stabilised Cu with oxygen-containing functional groups. The short-term and long-term leaching of Cu and As into the soil solution was negligible in the presence of the waste materials. However, the waste-stabilised soil did not maintain sufficient Cu stability in the TCLP tests, in which acetate buffer induced significant mineral dissolution of the waste materials. Conclusions: These results suggest that chelant-enhanced washing (significant reduction of Cu leachability) may be augmented with subsequent stabilisation with inorganic waste materials (effective control of As leachability), thus minimising the environmental risks of both Cu (heavy metal) and As (metalloid) while preserving the reuse value of the soil. Additional tests under field-relevant conditions are required to provide a holistic performance evaluation.
ISSN: 1439-0108
EISSN: 1614-7480
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-013-0831-y
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Feb 5, 2019


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Feb 15, 2019

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Feb 10, 2019

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.