Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/25263
Title: A comparison of treatment effectiveness between the CAD/CAM method and the manual method for managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors: Wong, MS 
Cheng, JCY
Lo, KH
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Source: Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2005, v. 29, no. 1, p. 105-111 How to cite?
Journal: Prosthetics and orthotics international 
Abstract: The treatment effectiveness of the CAD/CAM method and the manual method in managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was compared. Forty subjects were recruited with twenty subjects for each method. The clinical parameters namely Cobb's angle and apical vertebral rotation were evaluated at the pre-brace and the immediate in-brace visits. The results demonstrated that orthotic treatments rendered by the CAD/CAM method and the conventional manual method were effective in providing initial control of Cobb's angle. Significant decreases (p < 0.05) were found between the pre-brace and immediate in-brace visits for both methods. The mean reductions of Cobb's angle were 12.8° (41.9%) for the CAD/CAM method and 9.8° (32.1%) for the manual method. An initial control of the apical vertebral rotation was not shown in this study. In the comparison between the CAD/CAM method and the manual method, no significant difference was found in the control of Cobb's angle and apical vertebral rotation. The current study demonstrated that the CAD/CAM method can provide similar result in the initial stage of treatment as compared with the manual method.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/25263
ISSN: 0309-3646
EISSN: 1746-1553
DOI: 10.1080/17461550500069547
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 19, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 21, 2017

Page view(s)

36
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on Sep 17, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.