Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery
Authors: Guo, YP
Wong, PM
Li, Y 
Or, PL
Keywords: Abdominal surgery
Double gloving
Glove perforation rate
Perioperative nurses
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Excerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Inc
Source: American journal of surgery, 2012, v. 204, no. 2, p. 210-215 How to cite?
Journal: American Journal of Surgery 
Abstract: Background: Surgical teams rely on surgical gloves as a barrier to protect themselves against blood-borne pathogenic infections during surgery. Double-gloving is adopted by surgeons to tackle the problem of glove perforation. Nevertheless, double-gloving is not practiced commonly by operating room nurses and there are only limited studies about double-gloving that targets only perioperative nurses. The aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness of double-gloving in protecting perioperative nurses by comparing the frequency of glove perforation between single-gloving and double-gloving groups. Methods: A prospective and randomized study was performed. Nurses were assigned randomly to single-gloved and double-gloved groups for comparison of the glove perforation rate. Water-leakage and air-inflation tests were used to detect glove perforation. Results: Glove perforations was detected in 10 of 112 sets of single-gloves (8.9%) and 12 of 106 sets of outer gloves in the double-gloved group (11.3%). There was no inner double-glove perforation (0%). Glove perforations were found in 6 and 4 of the 112 sets of single-gloves for the first assistants (5.36%) and the scrub nurses (3.57%), and 5 and 7 of 106 sets of outer gloves in the double-gloved group for the first assistants (4.72%) and the scrub nurses (6.60%), respectively. The average occurrence of perforation was 69.8 minutes (range, 20-110 min) after the beginning of surgery. The sites of perforation were localized mostly on the left middle finger (42%) and the left ring finger (33.3%). Conclusions: Based on the findings of the study, double-gloving is indeed effective in protecting operating room nurses against blood-borne pathogen exposure. It should be introduced as a routine practice.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 2, 2018


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 15, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 15, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.