Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/23165
Title: Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery
Authors: Guo, YP
Wong, PM
Li, Y 
Or, PL
Keywords: Abdominal surgery
Double gloving
Glove perforation rate
Perioperative nurses
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Excerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Inc
Source: American journal of surgery, 2012, v. 204, no. 2, p. 210-215 How to cite?
Journal: American Journal of Surgery 
Abstract: Background: Surgical teams rely on surgical gloves as a barrier to protect themselves against blood-borne pathogenic infections during surgery. Double-gloving is adopted by surgeons to tackle the problem of glove perforation. Nevertheless, double-gloving is not practiced commonly by operating room nurses and there are only limited studies about double-gloving that targets only perioperative nurses. The aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness of double-gloving in protecting perioperative nurses by comparing the frequency of glove perforation between single-gloving and double-gloving groups. Methods: A prospective and randomized study was performed. Nurses were assigned randomly to single-gloved and double-gloved groups for comparison of the glove perforation rate. Water-leakage and air-inflation tests were used to detect glove perforation. Results: Glove perforations was detected in 10 of 112 sets of single-gloves (8.9%) and 12 of 106 sets of outer gloves in the double-gloved group (11.3%). There was no inner double-glove perforation (0%). Glove perforations were found in 6 and 4 of the 112 sets of single-gloves for the first assistants (5.36%) and the scrub nurses (3.57%), and 5 and 7 of 106 sets of outer gloves in the double-gloved group for the first assistants (4.72%) and the scrub nurses (6.60%), respectively. The average occurrence of perforation was 69.8 minutes (range, 20-110 min) after the beginning of surgery. The sites of perforation were localized mostly on the left middle finger (42%) and the left ring finger (33.3%). Conclusions: Based on the findings of the study, double-gloving is indeed effective in protecting operating room nurses against blood-borne pathogen exposure. It should be introduced as a routine practice.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/23165
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

Page view(s)

35
Last Week
2
Last month
Checked on Aug 13, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.