Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/22892
Title: A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes
Authors: Lee, WL 
Keywords: BEAM
Benchmarking
BREEAM
CASBEE
Chinese
ESGB
LEED
Metrics
Plus
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Energy and Buildings, 2013, v. 62, p. 403-413 How to cite?
Journal: Energy and buildings 
Abstract: Buildings are key target of policies that aim at promoting environmentally sustainable development. Amongst policy instruments that address environmental burdens incurred by buildings, labelling and certification schemes are arguably the most cost-effective. Since the first building environmental assessment scheme was launched in the 1990's, similar schemes have emerged in about 30 countries. These are mainly domestic schemes tailored to suit local contexts. Whilst most of these schemes take a voluntary, market driven approach, some have become a part of mandatory building approval requirements, though different certification schemes may co-exist in some regimes. Benchmarking the strengths and characteristics of different schemes has been advocated. In this connection, this paper provides a comprehensive review and comparison of the issues and metrics of five representative assessment schemes, namely, BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE, BEAM Plus and the Chinese scheme ESGB. Comparison of these five schemes shows that BREEAM and LEED are the most comprehensive. A two-phase certification method is adopted in LEED, CASBEE and BEAM Plus, which is considered preferable. Statistical analysis also reveals that there is a moderate degree of agreement amongst the five schemes on weights and ranks of weights allocated to five key assessment aspects. Through comparison, the weighting coefficients adopted by ESGB were found the most representative. Strengths and characteristics of the five schemes have been identified for reference of policy makers in developing their domestic schemes.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/22892
ISSN: 0378-7788
EISSN: 1872-6178
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.014
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

38
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 11, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
Last Week
0
Last month
2
Citations as of Sep 21, 2017

Page view(s)

78
Last Week
3
Last month
Checked on Sep 17, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.